Now, I realize there are
some in my party who don’t think we should make any changes at all
to Medicare and Medicaid, and I understand their concerns. But
here’s the truth. Millions of Americans rely on Medicare in their
retirement. And millions more will do so in the future. They pay for
this benefit during their working years. They earn it. But with an
aging population and rising health care costs, we are spending too
fast to sustain the program. And if we don’t gradually reform the
system while protecting current beneficiaries, it won’t be there
when future retirees need it. We have to reform Medicare to
strengthen it.I’m also well aware
that there are many Republicans who don’t believe we should raise
taxes on those who are most fortunate and can best afford it. But
here is what every American knows. While most people in this country
struggle to make ends meet, a few of the most affluent citizens and
corporations enjoy tax breaks and loopholes that nobody else gets.
Right now, Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary –
an outrage he has asked us to fix. We need a tax code where everyone
gets a fair shake, and everybody pays their fair share. And I
believe the vast majority of wealthy Americans and CEOs are willing
to do just that, if it helps the economy grow and gets our fiscal
house in order.
I’ll also
offer ideas to reform a corporate tax code that stands as a monument
to special interest influence in Washington. By eliminating pages of
loopholes and deductions, we can lower one of the highest corporate
tax rates in the world. Our tax code shouldn’t give an advantage to
companies that can afford the best-connected lobbyists. It should
give an advantage to companies that invest and create jobs here in
America.
So we can reduce this deficit, pay down our
debt, and pay for this jobs plan in the process. But in order to do
this, we have to decide what our priorities are. We have to ask
ourselves, “What’s the best way to grow the economy and create
jobs?”
Should we keep tax loopholes for oil companies?
Or should we use that money to give small business owners a tax
credit when they hire new workers? Because we can’t afford to do
both. Should we keep tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires?
Or should we put teachers back to work so our kids can graduate
ready for college and good jobs? Right now, we can’t afford to do
both.
This isn’t political grandstanding. This isn’t
class warfare. This is simple math. These are real choices that we
have to make. And I’m pretty sure I know what most Americans would
choose. It’s not even close. And it’s time for us to do what’s right
for our future.
The American Jobs Act answers the urgent need
to create jobs right away. But we can’t stop there. As I’ve argued
since I ran for this office, we have to look beyond the immediate
crisis and start building an economy that lasts into the future – an
economy that creates good, middle-class jobs that pay well and offer
security. We now live in a world where technology has made it
possible for companies to take their business anywhere. If we want
them to start here and stay here and hire here, we have to be able
to out-build, out-educate, and out-innovate every other country on
Earth.
This task, of making America more competitive
for the long haul, is a job for all of us. For government and for
private companies. For states and for local communities – and for
every American citizen. All of us will have to up our game. All of
us will have to change the way we do business.
My administration can and will take some steps
to improve our competitiveness on our own. For example, if you’re a
small business owner who has a contract with the federal government,
we’re going to make sure you get paid a lot faster than you do now.
We’re also planning to cut away the red tape that prevents too many
rapidly-growing start-up companies from raising capital and going
public. And to help responsible homeowners, we’re going to work with
Federal housing agencies to help more people refinance their
mortgages at interest rates that are now near 4% — a step that can
put more than $2,000 a year in a family’s pocket, and give a lift to
an economy still burdened by the drop in housing prices.
Other steps will require Congressional action.
Today you passed reform that will speed up the outdated patent
process, so that entrepreneurs can turn a new idea into a new
business as quickly as possible. That’s the kind of action we need.
Now it’s time to clear the way for a series of trade agreements that
would make it easier for American companies to sell their products
in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea – while also helping the
workers whose jobs have been affected by global competition. If
Americans can buy Kias and Hyundais, I want to see folks in South
Korea driving Fords and Chevys and Chryslers. I want to see more
products sold around the world stamped with three proud words: “Made
in America.”
And on all of our efforts to strengthen
competitiveness, we need to look for ways to work side-by-side with
America’s businesses. That’s why I’ve brought together a Jobs
Council of leaders from different industries who are developing a
wide range of new ideas to help companies grow and create jobs.
Already, we’ve mobilized business leaders to
train 10,000 American engineers a year, by providing company
internships and training. Other businesses are covering tuition for
workers who learn new skills at community colleges. And we’re going
to make sure the next generation of manufacturing takes root not in
China or Europe, but right here, in the United States of America. If
we provide the right incentives and support – and if we make sure
our trading partners play by the rules – we can be the ones to build
everything from fuel-efficient cars to advanced biofuels to
semiconductors that are sold all over the world. That’s how America
can be number one again. That’s how America will be number one
again.
Now, I realize that some of you have a
different theory on how to grow the economy. Some of you sincerely
believe that the only solution to our economic challenges is to
simply cut most government spending and eliminate most government
regulations.
Well, I agree that we
can’t afford wasteful spending, and I will continue to work with
Congress to get rid of it. And I agree that there are some rules
and regulations that put an unnecessary burden on businesses at
a time when they can least afford it. That’s why I ordered a
review of all government regulations. So far, we’ve identified
over 500 reforms, which will save billions of dollars over the
next few years. We should have no more regulation than the
health, safety, and security of the American people require.
Every rule should meet that common sense test.
But what we can’t do – what I won’t do – is let
this economic crisis be used as an excuse to wipe out the basic
protections that Americans have counted on for decades. I reject
the idea that we need to ask people to choose between their jobs
and their safety. I reject the argument that says for the
economy to grow, we have to roll back protections that ban
hidden fees by credit card companies, or rules that keep our
kids from being exposed to mercury, or laws that prevent the
health insurance industry from shortchanging patients. I reject
the idea that we have to strip away collective bargaining rights
to compete in a global economy. We shouldn’t be in a race to the
bottom, where we try to offer the cheapest labor and the worst
pollution standards. America should be in a race to the top. And
I believe that’s a race we can win.
In
fact, this larger notion that the only thing we can do to
restore prosperity is just dismantle government, refund
everyone’s money, let everyone write their own rules, and tell
everyone they’re on their own – that’s not who we are. That’s
not the story of America.
Yes, we are rugged individualists. Yes, we
are strong and self-reliant. And it has been the drive and
initiative of our workers and entrepreneurs that has made this
economy the engine and envy of the world.
But there has always been another thread
running throughout our history – a belief that we are all
connected; and that there are some things we can only do
together, as a nation.
We all remember Abraham Lincoln as the
leader who saved our Union. But in the middle of a Civil War, he
was also a leader who looked to the future – a Republican
president who mobilized government to build the transcontinental
railroad; launch the National Academy of Sciences; and set up
the first land grant colleges. And leaders of both parties have
followed the example he set.
Ask yourselves – where would we be right
now if the people who sat here before us decided not to build
our highways and our bridges; our dams and our airports? What
would this country be like if we had chosen not to spend money
on public high schools, or research universities, or community
colleges? Millions of returning heroes, including my
grandfather, had the opportunity to go to school because of the
GI Bill. Where would we be if they hadn’t had that chance?
How many jobs would it have cost us if past
Congresses decided not to support the basic research that led to
the Internet and the computer chip? What kind of country would
this be if this Chamber had voted down Social Security or
Medicare just because it violated some rigid idea about what
government could or could not do? How many Americans would have
suffered as a result?
No single individual built America on their
own. We built it together. We have been, and always will be, one
nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for
all; a nation with responsibilities to ourselves and with
responsibilities to one another. Members of Congress, it is time
for us to meet our responsibilities.
Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight is the
kind that’s been supported by Democrats and Republicans in the
past. Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight will be paid for. And
every proposal is designed to meet the urgent needs of our
people and our communities.
I know there’s been a lot of skepticism
about whether the politics of the moment will allow us to pass
this jobs plan – or any jobs plan. Already, we’re seeing the
same old press releases and tweets flying back and forth.
Already, the media has proclaimed that it’s impossible to bridge
our differences. And maybe some of you have decided that those
differences are so great that we can only resolve them at the
ballot box.
But know this: the next election is
fourteen months away. And the people who sent us here – the
people who hired us to work for them – they don’t have the
luxury of waiting fourteen months. Some of them are living week
to week; paycheck to paycheck; even day to day. They need help,
and they need it now.
I don’t pretend that this plan will solve
all our problems. It shouldn’t be, nor will it be, the last plan
of action we propose. What’s guided us from the start of this
crisis hasn’t been the search for a silver bullet. It’s been a
commitment to stay at it – to be persistent – to keep trying
every new idea that works, and listen to every good proposal, no
matter which party comes up with it.
Regardless of the arguments we’ve had in
the past, regardless of the arguments we’ll have in the future,
this plan is the right thing to do right now. You should pass
it. And I intend to take that message to every corner of this
country. I also ask every American who agrees to lift your voice
and tell the people who are gathered here tonight that you want
action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not an option.
Remind us that if we act as one nation, and one people, we have
it within our power to meet this challenge.
President Kennedy once said, “Our problems
are man-made – therefore they can be solved by man. And man can
be as big as he wants.”
These are difficult years for our country.
But we are Americans. We are tougher than the times that we live
in, and we are bigger than our politics have been. So let’s meet
the moment. Let’s get to work, and show the world once again why
the United States of America remains the greatest nation on
Earth. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United
States of America.

Obama Jobs Plan: $447
Billion, More Than Half In Tax Cuts, To Be Paid For By Super
Committee
Excerpt from an article by Sam
Stein on huffingtonpost.com on September 8, 2011
WASHINGTON -- Hoping to stem
the tide of poor economic news, President Barack Obama proposed a
$447 billion jobs plan to Congress on Thursday evening.
Titled the American Jobs Act, the proposal
includes more than $250 billion in tax incentives for small
businesses and employers, according to administration estimates. The
rest of the money would be devoted to infrastructure spending, state
aid, unemployment insurance, and neighborhood rehabilitation. The
president will pay for the proposal by asking the congressional
super committee tasked with finding $1.5 trillion in deficit
reduction to offset the cost of the package in their proposal.
Senior administration officials said that the
White House plans to introduce the president's proposal next week as
a single piece of legislation. The same administration officials did
not rule out the idea that the White House would petition the
congressional super committee to simply include the jobs bill in the
set of recommendations that they reveal later this fall. In his
speech to a joint session of Congress, however, the President
repeatedly made the case that quicker action is needed.
"I am sending this Congress a plan that you
should pass right away," he said. "There should be nothing
controversial about this piece of legislation. Everything in here is
the kind of proposal that's been supported by both Democrats and
Republicans -- including many who sit here tonight. And everything
in this bill will be paid for. Everything."
A White House official said Obama phoned House
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell (R-Ky.) earlier in the day to discuss the need for rapid
passage of his jobs plan. During his speech, which was peppered with
a defiant sometimes combative tone, he pledged to sell his plan
outside of the D.C. Beltway as well.
"I intend to take that message to every corner
of this country," Obama said. "I also ask every American who agrees
to lift your voice and tell the people who are gathered here tonight
that you want action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not
an option." In all, the phrase "pass this jobs bill" was uttered
eight times in the president's speech, with several variations of
the phrase appearing elsewhere.
There was no mention as to how many jobs the
president believed his proposal would create. At a briefing before
the speech, senior administration officials declined to make such an
estimate as well. But underlying the whole proposal was the promise
that, down the road, it would be paid for. And in the latter portion
of his speech, Obama called for Congress to close special interest
tax loopholes as one way to cover that cost.
"This isn’t political grandstanding," he said.
"This isn’t class warfare. This is simple math. These are real
choices that we have to make."
At the heart of the president's plan is an
extension of the payroll tax cut passed last year, through 2012. The
proposal, which would affect an estimated 160 million workers by
providing a $1,500 tax cut for the average family, comes in at a
cost of $175 billion.
The tax components of the president's plan
don't end there. The White House also wants a payroll tax holiday
for businesses that add new workers or increase the wages of current
employees; a fifty percent reduction of the tax rates businesses pay
on the first $5 million in payroll; and a $4,000 tax credit for
employers who hire long-term unemployed workers.
On the spending side, the president is calling
for $50 billion in infrastructure repairs; $10 billion for an
infrastructure bank to help leverage private capital; $30 billion
for school modernization and repairs; and $35 billion in aid to
states and municipalities for the purposes of rehiring and retaining
teachers and first responders. The proposal would also re-authorize
federal unemployment benefits for another year, with additional
incentives for employers to retain their workers and train new ones
without any cost. A national wireless internet initiative and
changes to federal refinancing programs are also part of the
American Jobs Act.
The most innovative addition may be the $15
billion that the president is proposing for "Project Rebuild" a
program that would leverage private capital to finance the
refurbishing of vacant or foreclosed homes. According to a senior
administration official, the program would focus on "emerging
residential and commercial foreclosure problems" in an effort to
raise plummeting property values in those areas and avoid "community
blight."
The president's suggested
spending totals are a drop in the bucket in terms of the economy's
actual needs. Obama's top advisers have, in the past,
estimated that
the country faces a $2 trillion infrastructure deficit. There is an
estimated
$270 billion to $500 billion
in backlogged school maintenance costs. More than 200,000 government
jobs
have been slashed
in the past year, many of them teachers and emergency first
responders.
But the outlines were cheered
by Democrats as an important start, as well as a much-needed shift
in a political conversation that has been dominated by budget cuts.
Even in the face of
obvious need, however, it's unclear if Congress as a whole possesses
the political will to back the president's requests. Republican
lawmakers have made cutting taxes a top priority over the past few
years, but even before the president's address, GOP senators were
balking at
the idea of temporarily extending the payroll tax cut. Even
progressives aren't entirely enamored with the idea, with serious
concern among Social Security advocates that an extension would
drain money from the entitlement program's trust fund -– even though
the administration's proposal instructs the Treasury to replenish
that fund's coffers.
More problematic could be the amount of
spending Obama is proposing and the vague outlines for how it will
be paid for. Despite petitioning for infrastructure money for their
home districts, Republicans have castigated all proposals for
federal stimulus. The idea that the super committee will pick up the
tab seems unlikely to quiet GOP criticism that the plan will
increase the national debt.
But that may be the trick up the
administration's sleeve. The administration officials in the
pre-speech briefing left open the door to having the super committee
write the president's bill into their final set of recommendations,
rather than just offset the cost of a separate proposal. Doing so
would mean that the jobs plan wouldn't come up for a vote until late
December. But it would also give it a much more likely chance of
passage, as components of same triggers that apply to the
committee's debt reduction suggestions -- mostly major cuts to
defense spending and Medicare -- would suddenly apply to the
president's jobs bill.
"Obviously it could be passed as a part of a
larger grand bargain, but we don't want to limit our options to
that," said a senior administration official. "It would be very
positive for this economy for this to pass quickly and for it to
pass in a way that people could see we're willing to work together
to do something bold on creating demand in the short term, and a
context in which we're also creating a confidence in our long term
fiscal situation."
Bridge To Work: Obama's Plan For Long-Term
Unemployed

Excerpt from an article on
huffingtonpost.com Posted: 9/8/11 by Arthur Delaney arthur@huffingtonpost.com
WASHINGTON -- President Obama announced
Thursday evening a plan to put the long-term jobless back to work by
encouraging states to adopt "Bridge to Work" programs that would let
businesses try out workers without having to pay them.
The scheme, which would only be open to workers
receiving federal unemployment benefits, would be modeled mainly on
a Georgia program designed to reduce hiring costs and make it easier
for the jobless to get back to work. The program, called Georgia
Works, is voluntary for workers and employers and allows businesses
to train workers for eight weeks with no obligation to pay or hire.
"We have to do more to help the long-term
unemployed in their search for work," President Obama said while
addressing a joint session of Congress. "This jobs plan builds on a
program in Georgia that several Republican leaders have highlighted,
where people who collect unemployment insurance participate in
temporary work as a way to build their skills while they look for a
permanent job."
Labor advocates have warned the White House to
stay away from Georgia Works, complaining that it is exploitive and
possibly illegal. A senior administration official said the White
House is sensitive to those concerns. "We have made it very clear
that states must ensure compliance with the Fair Labor Standards
Act," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Bridge to Work programs would be different from
Georgia Works in several ways. Under the Obama proposal, states
would be required to ensure participants earn no less than the
minimum wage. So if a jobless worker's unemployment insurance
benefit amounted to less than the minimum wage, states would have to
boost the benefit.
Bridge to Work programs would only be open to
jobless workers who've exhausted the standard 26 weeks of
state-funded benefits and become eligible for the federal Emergency
Unemployment Compensation program, which provides up to 53
additional weeks of aid. The EUC program is set to expire in
January; the administration is pushing for Congress to reauthorize
it through 2012 as part of the "American Jobs Act," which would
include funding for Bridge to Work and dozens of other initiatives.
Republicans controlling the House of
Representatives have
signaled support for a program
modeled on Georgia Works, but they've also said they'd oppose
another reauthorization of federal unemployment benefits if the cost
added to the federal budget deficit.
"If the millions of unemployed Americans
stopped getting this insurance, and stopped using that money for
basic necessities, it would be a devastating blow to this economy,"
Obama said. "Democrats and Republicans in this Chamber have
supported unemployment insurance plenty of times in the past. At
this time of prolonged hardship, you should pass it again -– right
away."
Money for states to administer Bridge to Work
programs would come from a $4 billion "Reemployment NOW Fund" that
would also support a range of reforms, including wage insurance,
startup assistance, improved reemployment services, and
work-sharing.
There
isn't a ton of data on Georgia Works
or similar programs in other states. But there's plenty of data
testifying to the magnitude of the long-term unemployment crisis:
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 6 million people have
been out of work for six months or longer as of August, and 2
million have been out of work for longer than 99 weeks -- the cutoff
point for federal jobless benefits in the hardest-hit states.
States that decided to adopt Bridge to Work
initiatives would have some flexibility. Training periods could last
as long as eight weeks or be as short as two weeks. Businesses could
train participants for up to 38 hours a week (Georgia Works limits
training to 24 hours a week). States could also require
participating employers to pay a portion of workers' earnings.
"We're going to deem these [Emergency
Unemployment Compensation] benefits wages and provide support for
states to top up benefits if necessary to comply with the minimum
wage," the official said. "If states want to structure programs so
employers have skin in the game, we’re not going to stop them."
Participants in the program will be covered by
workers' compensation laws. As the FLSA requires, states will be
required to prevent businesses from using trainees instead of hiring
new workers, and businesses will not be able to use Bridge to Work
participants if a strike is in effect or if doing so would violate a
collective bargaining agreement.
This story includes remarks from President
Obama.
Arthur Delaney is the author of "A
People's History of the Great Recession," HuffPost's
first e-book.
Enemies of Freedom:
HOME
| MICHELLE
BACHMANN | RICHARD
M. SCAIFE | JOHN
ENSIGN | MARK
SANFORD | SAM
BROWNBACK
| TOM
COBURN
MIKE
ENZI |
GARY BAUER
|
DAN BURTON | |
JOHN
BARRASSO
| DICK
ARMEY | LAMAR
ALEXANDER | MAX
BAUCUS
| GARY
BAUER
| THE
BIRTHERS
ROY BLUNT | JOHN
BOEHNER
|
KIT BOND
| JIM
BUNNING | RICHARD
BURR |
KEN
CALVERT | ERIC
CANTOR | SAXBY
CHAMBLISS
| TOM
COBURN
BOB
CORKER CHUCK
GRASSLEY
|
SEN. CORNYN
| ANN
COULTER
| JIM
INHOFE | JIM
DEMINT
| BILL
NELSON |
PAT
ROBERTSON
|
ADOLPH COORS
JAMES DOBSON
| LATE
JERRY FALWELL
SEN.
CRAPO |
TOM DELAY | RICHARD
DEVOS
|
DICK
CHENEY
| DOUG
LAMBORN |
THE FAR RIGHT PURPOSE
GIULIANI |
GLENN BECK
LINDSEY GRAHAM |
JUDD GREGG |
JEFF GANNON
| REPUBLICAN
HALL OF SHAME | SEAN
HANNITY
| HEALTHCARE
REFORM
LARRY PRATT |
WALLY HERGER
| MIKE
HUCKABEE
JOHNNY
ISAKSON |
JEB BUSH |
MIKE
JOHANNS | JOHN
MCCAIN | MITCH
MCCONNEL
DICK MORRIS
|
NEWT GINGRICH | BILL
O'REILLY | RUSH
LIMBAUGH
SARAH
PALIN |
SEN. RISCH
|
PAUL ROBERTSON | SEN.
ROBERTS
GEORGE ROCHE
| MITT
ROMNEY | RONALD
REAGAN |
KARL ROVE |
SEN. SESSIONS |
RICHARD SHELBY |
TOM TANCREDO
|
TRENT FRANKS
REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR RAPE
|
LT. GOV.
ANDRE BAUER |
CHRISTIAN HIJACK |
FOX NEWS
MICHELLE MALKIN
|
MARK PRYOR
MIKE MCINTYRE |
JOE PITTS |
HEATH SHULER |
BART STUPAK |
CHRISTIAN RECONSTRUCTIONISTS
|
ZACK
WAMP
|
FRANK
WOLF
CHIP PICKERING |
TEA BAGGERS |
JOHN ASHCROFT |
LOUIS SHELDON
|
WYLY BROTHERS |
GEORGE W. BUSH UNOFFICIAL PAGE |
THE FAMILY