CONSERVATIVE PUNDITS AND THEIR PROBLEMS WITH THE TRUTH
OR WHERE WILL THEY BE PLACED IN DANTES INFERNO
RICHARD M. SCAIFE |
JOHN ENSIGN |
MARK SANFORD |
TOM COBURN |
GARY BAUER | DAN BURTON | | JOHN BARRASSO | DICK ARMEY | LAMAR ALEXANDER | MAX BAUCUS | GARY BAUER | THE BIRTHERS
ROY BLUNT | JOHN BOEHNER | KIT BOND | JIM BUNNING | RICHARD BURR | KEN CALVERT | ERIC CANTOR | SAXBY CHAMBLISS | TOM COBURN
BOB CORKER CHUCK GRASSLEY | SEN. CORNYN | ANN COULTER | JIM INHOFE | JIM DEMINT | BILL NELSON | PAT ROBERTSON | ADOLPH COORS
JAMES DOBSON | LATE JERRY FALWELL SEN. CRAPO | TOM DELAY | RICHARD DEVOS | DICK CHENEY | DOUG LAMBORN | THE FAR RIGHT PURPOSE
GIULIANI | GLENN BECK LINDSEY GRAHAM | JUDD GREGG | JEFF GANNON | REPUBLICAN HALL OF SHAME | SEAN HANNITY | HEALTHCARE REFORM
LARRY PRATT | WALLY HERGER | MIKE HUCKABEE JOHNNY ISAKSON | JEB BUSH | MIKE JOHANNS | JOHN MCCAIN | MITCH MCCONNEL
DICK MORRIS | NEWT GINGRICH | BILL O'REILLY | RUSH LIMBAUGH SARAH PALIN | SEN. RISCH | PAUL ROBERTSON | SEN. ROBERTS
GEORGE ROCHE | MITT ROMNEY | RONALD REAGAN | KARL ROVE | SEN. SESSIONS | RICHARD SHELBY | TOM TANCREDO | TRENT FRANKS
REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR RAPE | LT. GOV. ANDRE BAUER | CHRISTIAN HIJACK | FOX NEWS MICHELLE MALKIN | MARK PRYOR
MIKE MCINTYRE | JOE PITTS | HEATH SHULER | BART STUPAK | CHRISTIAN RECONSTRUCTIONISTS | ZACK WAMP | FRANK WOLF
CHIP PICKERING | TEA BAGGERS | JOHN ASHCROFT | LOUIS SHELDON | WYLY BROTHERS | GEORGE W. BUSH UNOFFICIAL PAGE | THE FAMILY
All who donate will
receive a 23 page professional Horoscope!
To Donate by Credit Card click on the Button Below
Thank You for Whatever you can do.
If you are interested in becoming Spiritually Enlightened...Click HERE or on the Red Dragon Below. You will be taken to a page which will reveal the gateway to Enlightenment.
Click on the below image and read the Quest - you will discover the secret Grail of Immortality. Then click on and read the Way and finally The Word. The three books are available in Kindle format. Go to Barnes and Noble for Nook format.
Go to http://professionalleft.blogspot.com for a treat!!!
(TEA PARTY) REPUBLICAN
AND PUNDITS THE ENEMY AND TRAITORS TO AMERICA? by R. Blackbird
Extremist (Tea Party) Republican Pundits are selfish, power hungry, hateful of the poor, disloyal to the nation and its people, dishonest, avaricious, scornful of the nation's history, the dignity of its institutio
Those Extremist Republican Pundits hate the rest of us, which they must, in order to pass away from themselves and onto us, the financial burdens and losses their crimes, schemes and thefts cause. They are prolific, incessant, and destructive liars. They are blasphemers for they insist that their hateful and destructive deeds are the work of God. They are apostates for they gleefully attack the poor, the immigrants, the old and the sick, of whom God has commanded all of us to be mindful.
There is no reasoning with them, for all their logic is built on false premises. There is no appealing to them for honor's sake for they have lost all sense of shame and have no honor, there is no appealing to them for the nation's sake for that it what they hate the most.
Extremist (Tea Party) Republican Pundits are the enemy.
The conservative movement is an elaborate moneymaking venture
What is a Pundit? Pundit: a self styled expert who expounds on what they think they know, in public. Most of the time they expound propaganda which can be attributed to the Right or the Left (mostly the Right). When in fact these media mavens know next to nothing about the subjects they talk about. The below listed people are sometimes called Media Personalites. Some are raging conservative pundits, some are liberal and some are subtle Pundits. The last few years have witnessed the emergence of a new class of pundits. Many pundits, regrettably, are prodigies in the aggressive political jargon that pervades our political discourse. They really don't have anything to say of any consequence, they are entertainers. They say things to get a reaction because they thrive on controversy. Unfortunately some of them seem to tell tall tales and twist the truth. Dante has a special Circle of Hell to put them in.
Between Michelle Malkin Swift Boating a traumatically injured 12-year-old boy, Rush Limbaugh denigrating anti-war veterans, and Bill O'Reilly insulting black Americans (not to mention Ann Coulter dissing Jews), the mighty right-wing media machine -- firmly attached to the hip of the Republican Party -- is in the process of driving American conservatism right off a cliff. The loudmouths whom conservatives have supported for years, and whom Republican politicians have used for political gain, have become increasingly unhinged. And their recent public antics are drawing more and more disbelieving stares.
With the Bush administration in a state of prolonged decline and with Republicans out of power on Capitol Hill, the right-wing media machine maintained the highest profile among conservatives on a daily basis. And Malkin and Limbaugh and O'Reilly became the face of the Republican Party.
For liberals, that was a good thing, as the GOP was forced to deal with the sludge that keeps washing up on its shores, courtesy of its favorite media stars who now bide their time insulting black entrepreneurs, war vets, and injured children.
Make no mistake, it was that bewildering list of undeserving targets that caused so many people in recent years to express disgust with the conservative talkers. Their comments and attacks could not be explained away as merely Malkin, Limbaugh, and O'Reilly playing their distasteful brand of partisan hardball and taking whacks at public figures. Rather, much like the unexplainable attack Don Imus leveled at the Rutgers women's basketball team, the barbs were aimed at ordinary Americans, leading to the collective refrain of, "What is wrong with these people?"
What's wrong is their recent wild-eyed pronouncements and consuming sense of martyrdom (why should they apologize when they're the victims?) created the type of cumulative, three-week media meltdowns that we haven't seen in years. And, with specific regard to Limbaugh and O'Reilly, the fact that both men physically could not stop talking about the controversies (i.e. themselves) was a huge boost for progressives, many of whom were privately nervous the O'Reilly-goes-to-Harlem and Limbaugh-attacks-the-troops stories might fizzle after a day or two.
Instead, thanks to O'Reilly and Limbaugh's inability to look away from their own reflection or to turn down the volume of their own microphones, the stories motored on week after week, doing great damage to both men and to the conservative movement, which defends the talkers at any cost.
Then, as if on cue, Malkin unleashed her crusade to slime the family of a 12-year-old boy after he came forward to publicly support a government-funded health insurance program for children known as SCHIP. President Bush recently vetoed an attempt to expand the program. The boy, Graeme Frost, survived a week-long coma after his family's SUV crashed into a tree three winters ago. Graeme's sister was even more severely injured in the crash. Today she is blind in one eye and has difficulty with memory, learning, and speech.
That's who right-wing bloggers picked as the target of their smear campaign, posting all kinds of venom and falsehoods about the family.
Honestly, the Malkin-led jihad unfolded like a parody of blood-thirsty Republican bloggers -- an Onion-worthy spoof -- the kind that even I would have been too sheepish to dream up because the premise made them seem even loonier than I thought they were. How far off the range did Malkin and company roam with their wayward attacks on the Frost family? So far that even the trigger-happy crew at Fox News refused to saddle up and join the midnight posse, out to unmask a sick kid and his needy parents. (Keep in mind that for years Malkin maintained a steady presence on Fox News, yet the channel still wouldn't touch her pet project of hate last week.)
Driven to distraction
Over the years I've found that there's a direct link between the degree to which right-wing bloggers become unhinged and how lost the issue at hand is. That's one reason the war in Iraq has collectively driven them to distraction.
The same is true with their opposition to SCHIP. Politically, it's a lost cause. Americans overwhelmingly want the program to be expanded, and Bush's veto could be politically damaging for Republicans going into next year's elections, trying to explain why the GOP picked children's health care as the one issue to draw the line on government spending.
The Republican Noise Machine cannot stomach the issue of health care and tends to label any additional government aide to be the first step toward "socialized medicine." Unfortunately for them, the debate has moved substantially since that rallying cry was used nearly 15 years ago in an effort to beat back the Clinton health-care initiative. During the intervening years, according to the polls, the Democratic Party has taken ownership of the health-care issue, which more and more Americans select as one of the nation's top priority.
In other words, conservatives are in a very deep hole when it comes to health care. And last week the right-wing bloggers dug that hole a little deeper when the Frost story began to break online after a clueless member of the FreeRepublic community posted a completely erroneous attack on the family's supposed riches. Soon the cyber pitchforks were out, with the bloggers convinced they had uncovered a monumental fraud (i.e. Rich liberal kids get free health care!).
And yes, the Republican Party was on-board with the smear campaign. Fanning the flames early was an aide to Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) who sent out an email to journalists urging them to follow up on the online swarm that was enveloping the Frost family. Days later the White House rewarded Redstate.com for its litany of Frost attacks by sending the site an exclusive statement regarding the upcoming SCHIP vote. (That kind of White House nod is considered to be a major coup among the right-wing blogs.)
Keep in mind that the entire premise of the vicious anti-Frost campaign was faulty: SCHIP is intended for families who aren't poor enough to qualify for Medicaid but are not wealthy enough to afford private insurance -- it's intended for families just like the Frosts, with four kids (two of them in serious need of medical attention) and a household income of about $45,000. The bloggers kept pulling their hair out, shrieking about how the Frost family owns a (modest) house. The Frost family owns cars. The Frost parents have jobs, as if those were all shocking revelations. As if those disqualified the Frost family from receiving SCHIP support. As if those made the Frost family a fraud. They did not.
Prior to the accident, the Frosts did not have insurance because: a) they could not get any through their employers; and b) a policy purchased privately would have eaten up nearly one-third of their annual income. When a cataclysmic health-care emergency struck, the Frost family turned to the government for help for their children's medical costs. They qualified for SCHIP help because the Frost family confirmed, through tax returns or Social Security documents, their modest income status.
So where was Malkin's gotcha in all of this? There was none. None of the online vigilantes claimed the Frosts had duped the government by hiding their possessions, or that Democrats gave the family special treatment. The pointless, hateful exercise in intimidation was simply to humiliate a family whose children were nearly killed in a car accident.
Aside from feeling badly for the abuse the Frost family had to endure, in a way I was happy that everyone got to watch the hateful antics unfold in public. Like when Malkin called young Graeme Frost a "human shield" for Democrats, a term usually used in reference to Middle Eastern terrorists. (Malkin was appalled that when debating children's health care, Democrats brought forward a child like Graeme and let him tell his story.) Or when bloggers posted the Frosts' home address at a time when threats against the family were already being made. Or when Malkin did a creepy reconnaissance mission and drove by the Frosts' Baltimore home and reported which bumper sticker was affixed to their front door. Or when Malkin published a nameless email from somebody claiming to be the Frosts' neighbor with the breathless news about the numbers of vehicles the family supposedly owns.
Neighbors digging up dirt on neighbors anonymously, that's a nice touch.
The examples of depravity were everywhere last week, with virtually every robotic right-wing blogger dutifully dumping on the Frost family, and often doing it with a demented sense of glee. Go here to read Weekly Standard blogger Samantha Sault's take on the Frost story and count the number of falsehoods she passed along, while making fun ("just for laughs") of the working family with two seriously injured children. Also note that when the right-wing lies about the Frosts were quickly disproved (i.e. they do not pay $20,000 a year to send their kids to private schools), Sault failed to acknowledge the litany of smears she helped spread about a 12-year-old boy who survived a coma. (No wonder so few people take the Weekly Standard seriously when it lectures The New Republic about journalism ethics; the Standard appears to have none of its own.)
But the whole messy slime offensive against the Frost family came as no surprise to anyone who follows Malkin and her army of true believers. As I detailed last winter and spring, they're most dangerous when they accidentally bump into some facts and suddenly think they're Woodward and Bernstein.
The irony, of course, is that radical-right bloggers despise journalists and claim they're dishonest, biased, and even treasonous. But when the bloggers try to become journalists themselves, when they try (sort of) to report out a story like the supposed Frost blockbuster, the bloggers prove themselves to be comically incompetent as they publish falsehoods, connect nonexistent dots, cherry-pick information, and generally make fools of themselves. And boy, were Malkin and company busy last week doing all of the above.
Learning at Limbaugh's knee
Where did the right-wing bloggers learn their brand of drive-by invective? From Rush Limbaugh of course, who has made a career out of making hollow and erroneous allegations. So it was fitting that when Limbaugh recently stepped in it with his "phony soldiers" slur, it was right-wing bloggers who came to his rescue.
They wrote about the controversy obsessively -- you could almost hear the blood vessels pop over at RedState -- while most progressives were content to let the story play out, watching Limbaugh feed himself just enough rope each day. Like when he first claimed his "phony soldiers" comment (note the plural) was in reference to a single serviceman who faked his military service, then changed his story. Or when he later included Rep. Jack Murtha (D-PA.), a retired Marine colonel and decorated Vietnam veteran who opposes the war in Iraq, on his list of "genuine phony soldiers." Or when Limbaugh claimed to play "the entire transcript" of his "phony soldiers" exchange and post it on his website, when in fact he edited out a large chunk of the discussion. Or when he likened U.S. Iraq war vet Brian McGough to a suicide bomber after McGough taped a television ad criticizing Limbaugh's comments.
But here's what was most telling: It wasn't just bloggers who rushed to Limbaugh's defense, it was also key leadership members of the Republican Party. It was presidential contenders Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney. It was Senate Republican Conference chairman Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ). It was House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and his number two, Roy Blunt (R-MO), along with fellow Reps. Mike Pence (R-IN), Scott Garrett (R-NJ), and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), who supported legislation that commended Limbaugh following his "phony soldiers" crack, and Eric Cantor (R-VA) who unveiled a Stand With Rush e-petition, urging "conservatives around the country" to fight for Limbaugh.
An attack on Limbaugh is now seen by Republicans as an attack on the party itself. Why the GOP prefers to have a polarizing, hateful, and widely disliked talk show host as its point person remains open to speculation. What's not debatable, though, is that Limbaugh can often be an anchor around the GOP's neck.
Does anybody think Limbaugh helped Republicans win a single extra vote last autumn when, on the eve of the midterm elections, he uncorked a startling attack on actor Michael J. Fox for having the nerve to tape a television commercial urging political support for stem-cell research. Limbaugh claimed Fox, who suffers from Parkinson's disease, was faking his life-threatening ailments during the commercial: "It's purely an act. ... This is really shameless of Michael J. Fox." While Limbaugh made his audacious claim on the radio, in-studio video captured him making mocking, herky-jerky motions, as he did his best Parkinson's patient impersonation.
When Media Matters highlighted the bewildering attack and a full-fledged media firestorm ensued, Limbaugh, just like with the "phony soldiers" snafu, refused to apologize for his hateful and widely condemned harangue. A CNN poll taken at the time found that just 26 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of Limbaugh. Days later Republicans were swept out of office. And if the Democratic Party had sent over a gigantic gift basket to Limbaugh's EIB Broadcasting headquarters, it would have been completely appropriate.
Based on the recent ranting and ravings from Malkin and Limbaugh and O'Reilly, a lot more progressives may be expressing their thanks in the months to come.
Click on the Names Below and Find out a little more about these self styled messengers.
|To Donate by Credit Card
click on the Button Below
If you prefer to send a check. Make the check out to Camelot and send to: P.O. Box 673206, Marietta, GA 30006-0036
Although we are all unpaid volunteers at the RFCSE (a non-profit religious organization), we would like to give you the opportunity to help us support this webpage. Join the RFCSE and donate any amount as your membership contribution.
|For information on all individuals
and organizations listed in this website, or the name of a contact person in your area
that can give you further information on the Religious Freedom Coalition of the Southeast,
or the First Amendment Coalition, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Let us hear from
You may call also call us at 000-000-0000 If you access our voice mail, we will call you back collect if long distance.
Or, you can write to us at: RFCSE, P.O. Box 673206, Marietta, GA 30006-0036
There have been visitors to this page since January 1, 1998
1992 - 2009 by Camelot Press Group, Georgia First Amendment Coalition and the RFCSE
All rights reserved.