Rick Santorum
has always supported a extreme Conservative Christian position especially
when it comes to Church and State issues. It is apparent from the data
collected, that the first amendment may be in danger from his past and
future actions.
Upon calling his office we find that Islam, Judaism, Shintoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, or Wicca "..aren't "Real" religions."
What is a real religion, Mr Santorum? What you have been practicing?
Read the following and remember: "By their Works may they be known."
We believe that Rick will one day reside in Dante's ninth level of Hell!
(Remember it is best to investigate on your own when
looking at allegations about anyone. Don't believe us,
think for yourself and investigate for yourself! And remember, the
Freedom of Religion Coalition does not represent any political party nor do
we recommend any political candidate, nor are we involving ourselves in the
political process.
"Rick Santorum is one of the
great pulsars of our times: a collapsed gravity well of unblinking
stare. People innocently walking down the street, are drawn
into his orbit, helplessly drawn in by how utterly dense he is.
They cannot escape the completely impenetrable mass of darkness
surrounding his mind and become totally crushed & moronized by him."
By a Friend of
Religious Freedom
I've been scratching my head about two things
lately. One, how can someone who isn't a multimillionaire
vote Republican? Every platform they support is contrary to
the average working class citizen's needs. Two, how can anyone
profess to be a Christian when they obviously
are a hypocrite and
Liar? But when I listen to people like Rick
Santorum, Glen Beck, Sarah Palin, Michele
Bachmann, Sharon Angle and Christine O'Donnell speak, it becomes
clear how these things exist and why they are glorified.
Intelligence is awareness of ignorance.
Stupidity is ignorance of ignorance.
Now it all
makes sense. "It is better
to be silent and be thought a fool
than to speak and remove all doubt. "Variously
attributed to Lincoln, Elbert Hubbard, Mark Twain, Benjamin
Franklin and Socrates.
Marine Corps Sgt. Ron Geste - Iraq
EXTREMIST
TEA PARTY REPUBLICANS ARE
THE ENEMY AND TRAITORS TO AMERICA by R. Blackbird
Extremist Tea Party Republicans are selfish, power hungry, hateful of the poor, disloyal
to the nation and its people, dishonest, avaricious, scornful of the
nation's history, the dignity of its institutions, its standards of
political morality, and its vision of advancement for all the
people. The Republicans love war as long as they and theirs do not
have to put on helmets and carry guns into the fighting. They use lies
to start wars that kill hundreds of thousands of innocents and thousands
of our own military service people. They love massive war-time profits,
unavailable to their rich masters if war is absent.
Those
Extremist Republicans hate the rest of us, which they must, in order to
pass away from themselves and onto us, the financial burdens and losses
their crimes, schemes and thefts cause. They are prolific, incessant,
and destructive liars. They are blasphemers for they insist that
their hateful and destructive deeds are the work of God. They are
apostates for they gleefully attack the poor, the immigrants, the
old and the sick, of whom God has commanded all of us to be mindful.
There is no reasoning with them, for all their logic is built on false
premises. There is no appealing to them for honor's sake for they have
lost all sense of shame and have no honor, there is no appealing to them
for the nation's sake for that it what they hate the most.
Extremist Tea Party Republicans are the enemy.
THE TRUTH ABOUT
REPUBLICANS BY GEORGE CARLIN
http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/273071/detail/
Rick Santorum Does Not
Care for Those SNL Meanies
Rick Santorum, who is constitutionally
incapable of not whining whenever he opens his mouth, had a whiny
response to being made fun of on Saturday Night Live this
weekend.SNL did
another GOP debate sketch
and placed Santorum's character in a San Francisco gay bar, where he
was terribly uncomfortable, because Rick Santorum famously hates gay
people. Ha, that's me alright! the real Santorum could have
responded, if he were constitutionally capable of not whining
whenever he opens his mouth. Instead we get this, before he's even
watched the sketch:
"We've been hammered by the left for
my standing up for the traditional family and I will continue to
do so," Santorum told WGIR's "White House Brief" show despite
admitting that he had not seen the skit yet. "The left,
unfortunately, participates in bullying more than the right
does. They say that they're tolerant, and they're anything but
tolerant of people who disagree with them and support
traditional values."
Got it, SNL? No more common
jokes allowed. And under a Rick Santorum presidency, NBC will be
ordered to show a crappy VHS copy of
"Rick Santorum's Summer Dance Party"
every Saturday afternoon at 5:30, the new "late night," as the
country's military-enforced National Bedtime will be at 7.
Related Stories

Rick Santorum finished fourth in the Ames Straw
Poll
This led everyone to conclude that his showing was a
demonstration of how strong his campaign is, despite the fact that he's
got little money or organizational strength.
We read his finish as a demonstration of the strength of his
personal brand of peach jelly, which he handed out at Ames. It's sweet,
tacky deliciousness hit the taste buds of the average caucus-goer.
Mmmm-mmmm! Just one swallow and you'll pretty much hate gay people, too!
You might go so far as to opine that the 2008 financial crisis was a
product of gay marriage, and
not a giant over-leveraged casino scheme built by over-confident
greed-fiends!
Santorum left Ames feeling reinvigorated, the only explanation for why
he decided to make the following melodramatic lamentation: "Does anyone
believe that our freedom is as whole as it was at the time of our
founders? It is not."
I don't know, Rick! It's sort of awesome that the United States
doesn't have slavery anymore! But I guess there are all sorts of
points of views on the matter.
Dave Weigel
ruminates on the"persistence" of Rick Santorum, and notes that while
he doesn't have a plausible path to the GOP nomination, he's solidly on
the road to a sort of "political redemption."
"By starting out this campaign as a joke candidate, he can "win" if he
finishes as less than a joke," Weigel says. He points out that Santorum
is also poised to reap the personal financial benefits that follow a
presidential candidacy. (We're pretty sure that even your Carol Moseley-Brauns
get a bump in the speaking fee department.)

PART I
Rick Santorum Serves On
the Board of Universal Health Services Hospital Chain Being Sued By DOJ
An excerpt from
an article by Jason Cherkis on huffingtonpost.com 6/7/2011
WASHINGTON -- Former Pennsylvania
Sen. Rick Santorum, who announced his bid for president Monday, has
spent the past four years serving on the board of Universal Health
Services Inc. (UHS), one of the country's largest and most troubled
hospital chains.
It turns out Santorum may
have had a more personal stake in
railing against
President Barack Obama's signature health care legislation and beating
the drum for less government intrusion in our health care system. Both
federal and state officials have routinely cited UHS for a seemingly
endless number of violations, ranging from Medicaid fraud to patient
neglect and abuse. Investigations have uncovered everything from
riots to
rape to
homicide at UHS
facilities.
During Santorum's tenure on the
UHS board, state documents and court records show, patients at UHS
health care facilities have endured systemic failures that have cost
millions in court settlements. In several instances, the company and
its subsidiaries have been threatened with losing the ability to
take in federally-subsidized patients. At various times, states have
stopped sending children to UHS facilities. And in the last few
years, the King of Prussia, Pa.-based mega-company has been the
subject of two Department of Justice lawsuits accusing the chain of
fraud.According to
UHS' website, Santorum currently sits on the board's compensation
committee and the nominating/corporate governance committee.
Santorum's committees appear to play no direct role in overseeing
the actual operations of the hospitals. But the board -- like any
corporate board -- is responsible for maintaining oversight and
making sure facilities are safe and do not violate the law.
He was appointed to the board
in April 2007. UHS CEO and chairman of the board, Alan B. Miller,
said in a press release at the time, "Rick Santorum has a long
record of accomplishment and leadership and will provide valuable
advice to the board."
Through his campaign, Santorum
refused to comment about his ties to UHS nor the allegations
concerning the hospital chain. "I would encourage you to contact UHS
about these allegations," replied spokesperson Virginia Davis via
email. "If I have any additional contact from Sen. Santorum I will
let you know."
In response to The
Huffington Post's inquiries, UHS refused to elaborate on Santorum's
role as a board member. "UHS has always made quality and patient
safety its highest priorities at all of our facilities," the company
said in a statement
released to
The Huffington Post. "UHS has been one of the leading providers of
mental healthcare services for over 25 years because of our
commitment to quality and patient-focused programs. All of our
facilities are licensed by their states, nationally accredited
and/or certified and in good-standing. As a company, we strive to
always provide the best possible treatment in a safe environment."
According to the company's SEC
filings, as of Feb. 28, 2011, UHS owned 25 acute care hospitals and
206 behavioral health centers located in 37 states, Washington,
D.C., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The company also owns
or manages seven surgical hospitals and surgery and oncology
centers. The filings state that the company and/or its affiliates
currently face at least seven lawsuits addressing allegations
ranging from patient care to wage disputes among employees.
On Oct. 30, 2009, a
McAllen, Texas, hospital group owned by UHS agreed to pay the U.S.
government $27.5 million to settle allegations of what amounted to
medical payola, or providing kickbacks or "illegal compensation" to
doctors in an effort to pressure them to funnel patients to its
hospitals, according to a DOJ
press release.
The payments were disguised via "shame contracts" including medical
directorships and lease agreements.
Department of Justice
attorneys, along with their counterparts in Virginia, filed suit in
March 2010 against a UHS facility based in Southwest Virginia
charging that operators had committed Medicaid fraud. The facility
billed itself as an inpatient psychiatric facility for youth but did
not provide such services. The DOJ case, along with a whistleblower
lawsuit, also accused the facility of orchestrating a cover-up.
Timothy J. Heaphy, the
United States Attorney for the Western District of Virginia, stated
in a DOJ
press release:
"We intend to prove that these
defendants billed Medicaid for providing troubled children with
much needed psychiatric medical care when, in fact, they
provided no such service. We will not sit idly by and allow
healthcare providers to take advantage of troubled children in
order to feed their own desire for wealth. The Medicaid system
was designed to help the most vulnerable among us, not to line
the pockets of fraudsters."
In its statement, UHS claimed
that all patients at the Virginia facility were treated
appropriately.
But DOJ's conclusions wouldn't
surprise current and former UHS employees, who said the hospital and
treatment settings have been "depressing" and comparable to prisons
or worse.
Leah Mercer, a former employee
with the Pines, a residential treatment center located in the
Tidewater region of Virginia, described one unit as a "dog pen."
"It's a money making business,"
Mercer said. She worked not only at the Pines but also at an adult
treatment facility in Tennessee. "That's all it is ... Working with
adults and the kids in two different states and two different
facilities, there was no therapy. It was all about money."
Mercer, who used to work as a
prison corrections officer before working with emotionally disturbed
children at the Pines, says she was surprised by how little
experience was needed to work at the facility. "I know they pull a
lot from security people ... You could start out making $10, $11 an
hour and not know jack. You didn't have to know anything. In fact, I
had a 19-year-old stripper and this was her part-time job -- she was
part-time."
HuffPost readers: If
you've ever worked for UHS or have been a resident or patient at a
UHS facility, we want to hear from you. Tell us your stories by
emailing jason.cherkis@huffingtonpost.com. Please include your phone
number if you're willing to do an interview.
Santorum joined the UHS board
in April 2007. Here is just a sampling of incidents that have taken
place at the company's facilities during his tenure:
- In June 2007,
Omega Leach,
17, died after being strangled by staff at UHS' Chad Youth
Enhancement Center, located outside of Nashville, Tenn. Leach's
death was ruled a homicide. Two years earlier, a 14-year-old Long
Island girl died at the same facility.
According to the autopsy
on Leach,
news accounts at the time
stated that the youth had "multiple superficial blunt force
injuries" to his body as well as injuries to his neck muscles. He
also sustained scrapes and bruises to both shoulders as well as a
bruise under his left eye.
Omega Leach's family
subsequently sued UHS.
In 2010, UHS settled with the family for $10.5 million.
- In April 2010, North
Carolina government records reported that the Old Vineyard Youth
Services facility had been the scene of a sexual assault between two
male teenagers. One resident reportedly tried to force his roommate
"to have oral sex and intercourse holding roommate by neck to force
him to have oral sex and dragged him on the floor trying to have
intercourse." The residents, 17 and 15 years old, were found to not
be adequately monitored by staff. The Winston-Salem Journal
had previously reported
that the facility had been sited for a "long list of deficiencies
that included nurses' training and responses to incidents" in
October 2009.
- In September 2010, the
Chicago Tribune
reported that
in the previous two years, two rape allegations were levied at UHS'
Hartgrove Hospital. "Police were called to Hartgrove Hospital on the
city's West End when a juvenile patient alleged he was punched and
forced to perform oral sex on a male patient, then raped when he
tried to resist," the reporters noted. "The alleged victim was
hospitalized with abrasions consistent with rape, a police report
said."
The Tribune went on to detail
another incident involving a 13-year-old male who performed oral sex
on a 15-year-old in a crowded day room "with roughly 14 other youths
and only one hospital employee to monitor them."
- In April 2011, Two
Rivers Psychiatric Hospital in Kansas City
was barred from taking Medicaid
after feds discovered that hospital workers had failed to monitor a
suicidal woman who killed herself at the facility. Authorities also
ruled that workers had erred in their attempts to revive the woman.
The hospital has appealed the decision and challenged the decision
in court.
The Kansas City Star
also reported that the facility has a history of neglect issues:
"Federal records show that Two
Rivers has had a history of patient-care problems dating to
2008, when an Army soldier committed suicide at the hospital by
using bed linens to hang himself in a closet.
That year, inspectors also
found that a hospital employee had poured water over a patient’s
head and that a nurse had put a towel over an elderly patient’s
mouth to stop the patient from screaming.
Inspectors who examined
medical records in 2009 found little evidence that Two Rivers
patients were receiving psychotherapy or medical treatment other
than medications. In September 2010, the hospital refused the
emergency admission of a teenager who had threatened to kill
someone, records show."
- On April 18, 2011,
North Carolina authorities
announced that it would be removing all of its
wards from The Pines residential
treatment center after a youth made an allegation of sex abuse at
the facility. The incident triggered a larger investigation. North
Carolina officials found multiple instances of ill-trained staff,
inadequate staff-to-patient ratios, and "multiple safety risk
incidents," according to an
email from
N.C. authorities to Virginia officials concerning The Pines.
Virginia has since slapped The
Pines with a provisional license and halted sending state wards to
the facility. The D.C. government has also begun to pull its youths
from The Pines.
Susan Lawrence, a parent
and child advocate in Virginia, runs a
Facebook page
dedicated to cataloging abuses within the mental health system with
a particular focus on UHS facilities. In an interview, she called on
Santorum to investigate the company. "He talks about being brave,
about standing up to the establishment," she said. "That's a joke.
He should be asking hard questions of UHS ... If he wants to lead
the country, he should be able to lead a business."
"He's all concerned about
unborn children," Lawrence continued. "He's a lot less concerned
about children that are already here."
Santorum's relationship
with UHS
extends beyond the boardroom.
While he served on the board, the company donated $5,000 to his
political action committee, America's Foundation, in 2010. UHS CEO
Miller, as well as the company's employees, have donated thousands
more in previous campaigns.
This is the first in a
series of stories on UHS facilities during Santorum's tenure on the
hospital chain's board. Part II follows.
PART II
Inside Rick Santorum-Linked
Universal Health Services Facility: Herpes, Porn and Drug Dealing

WASHINGTON -- T. entered The Pines
Residential Treatment Center, located in Portsmouth, Va., needing help
for his emotional disorders, gender identity issues and violent
outbursts. This month, after a year and a half there, the eighth-grader
left the facility with herpes.
Heather Pinon, T.'s sister,
believes he got the sexually transmitted disease after having sex with
other boys in his restricted unit. There might be at least one other
culprit. Both Pinon and the boy's adoptive mother, Lorraine Honeycutt,
believe that he also carried on a sexual relationship with a Pines
employee. Pinon says she knows of letters that hint at such an affair.
"The information was given to the
therapist," Pinon said. "The therapist destroyed the letters. When we
asked my brother about it, he confirmed that he did write the letters
and that he had a special relationship with that staff member."
The staff member, they said, was
assigned to T. to prevent him from having sex with other kids.
The disease was just another
complication in a life that had many; T. called this latest his "herpes
thing." But it still devastated the boy who wasn't yet old enough for
algebra. "I felt extra scared," he told The Huffington Post in a recent
interview. "I wanted to cry and that's all I did for two days is cry
when they did tell me that."
For The Pines, T.'s diagnosis was
just part of another day. The Pines is the biggest for-profit
residential treatment center in Virginia. During the past three years,
it has also kicked up more abuse and neglect allegations than any other
facility there, state records show, earning an unprecedented level of
scrutiny from investigators with the state's licensing office and Office
of Human Rights. The facility, which covers three campuses that span the
tidewater region -- Brighton, Kempsville and Crawford -- has routinely
faced state orders to correct itself, according to licensing records.
The Pines may be exceptional in
terms of racking up state violations, but it also boasts a singular
distinction: The board of the center's parent company, Universal Health
Services, which bought The Pines in November, included former Sen. Rick
Santorum (R-Pa.).
Santorum, who recently launched a
presidential bid, resigned from the UHS board on June 15, a week after
the publication of a Huffington Post
report on UHS facilities during his tenure.
The former senator had served on the UHS board since 2007, a period
which saw the company twice sued by the Department of Justice.
Santorum's presidential campaign
did not return calls seeking comment.
The health care chain has faced
accusations of Medicaid fraud and employee grievances over pay. At one
facility,
a teen died while being restrained by staff.
The death was ruled a homicide.
* * * * *
The Pines had long teetered on the
brink of a shutdown, but the UHS takeover of the facility appears to
have erased what standards had been put in place. A short time after the
facility fell under UHS control in mid-November, it earned serious
punitive sanctions. Two months into the company's tenure, a sense of
lawlessness pervaded the facility, according to a review of documents
obtained by The Huffington Post through a public records request.
North Carolina, which had sent more
than 100 kids to The Pines, stopped doing so this past spring, when that
state's Division of Medical Assistance, along with other agencies, found
widespread and systemic breakdowns in how the facility treated its
children, according to the documents. In mid-April, the state concluded
that it had to pull all 140 or so of its children -- including T. -- out
of The Pines, according to email records.
Virginia has since barred new
admissions and slapped the facility with a provisional license.
According to the documents, Virginia inspectors found that Pines staff
had been caught watching a pornographic DVD with residents, that one
resident admitted to selling drugs and buying drugs from a Pines
employee and that records concerning the care of one resident had been
"fabricated."
In a statement released to The
Huffington Post, Universal Health Services defended its practices: "The
Pines management team is continually reviewing clinical programming,
procedures and staff training to enhance the provision of safe,
effective, and patient-centered treatment," the company statement reads.
"The Pines is actively addressing any and all concerns relating to the
treatment of our residents."
UHS would neither confirm nor deny
whether T. contracted herpes at The Pines. The company stated that it
had investigated whether an employee had carried on an affair with a
teen and ruled evidence of such a relationship "unsubstantiated." T.,
for his part, denied the tryst in his interview with The Huffington
Post, admitting only to having feelings for a staff member. Pinon, his
sister, says the family was never interviewed nor notified as part of
any UHS inquiry into the matter. "The only evidence of the affair was
destroyed by their staff member," she said, referring to T.'s writings
to the staffer.
Barely a teen, T. had already known
how it felt to fill his stomach with pills and to receive a jolt from a
police officer's Taser. Other things left deeper scars. T. had grown up
in Hamlet, N.C., abandoned from birth by his biological mother. He'd had
to hear stories about her and her new family living in faraway Oregon;
she didn't visit. He never knew his father.
T. was adopted by Honeycutt, his
own mother's former foster mother, who provided a stable and loving
home. But he fell into violent rages, and when they became too much to
handle, the child-welfare system sometimes had to find alternatives.
By the time T. was 8 years old,
group home staff and hospital nurses had become something of an extended
family. In at least one instance, however, they proved anything but
safe. At one group home, Pinon said, her brother claimed he'd been raped
by a staffer.
Not long after, T. wore out his
welcome at every group home and therapeutic foster care placement in the
state. He stabbed one foster parent with a fork. He ended up on
probation after pelting a foster dad's truck with rocks. He could be
equally destructive with his own body, using his thighs and arms as a
canvas for his not-so-secret cuttings.
Officials had to look beyond the
state's borders to Virginia to find T.'s next placement, a next chance
at normal. T. had gone to The Pines fresh from a psych ward. It turned
out to be a huge step backward.
On June 3 of this year, T. was
forced out of The Pines, this time not as a punishment but out of
concern for his own well being. Honeycutt and Pinon were there to pick
him up. There was no teary sendoff. A Pines worker greeted them at the
entrance with a taunt, according to Pinon. "We are so ready to get rid
of him," she recalled the worker saying.
Another employee shepherded T. to
their car. Both Pinon and Honeycutt recalled that she had one final
message for T. before leaving his side. If he gave his family a hard
time, the employee told him, "I'll beat your ass like a man."
A Pines staffer had already done
that, according to T.
T. had two black eyes. One came
from a staff member who T. said punched him after he complained about
the staffer flirting with a coworker.
One bruise was still a deep black,
while the other had started to fade. But both could still be seen
through T.'s foundation and rouge, and his pink-and-purple eye shadow.
While T. was at The Pines,
Honeycutt, 63, tried to follow up on her adopted son's treatment as best
she could. She kept in regular contact with T. and participated in
weekly therapy sessions by phone. When she needed gas money to make the
drive up to see him, she said she resorted to hosting yard sales where
she sold off her clothes and appliances. The real valuables she carted
off to Ned's Pawn Shop.
"My mom sold collectibles,
porcelain dolls," Pinon, 28, recalled. "All of her gold, she pretty much
pawned it or melted it down so she could afford gas or clothes for him.
I took her to the pawnshop one time -- she pulled out family heirlooms.
The people in the pawnshop were telling her not to do it. She sold it
anyway."
When T. complained that he went to
bed cold, Honeycutt bought him a blanket. When he needed clothes, she
mailed him pants and shirts from his favorite store, Hot Topic.
Honeycutt alleged that Pines
officials had promised to assist her with travel expenses but never came
through. "They lied," she said. "They were supposed to meet me part of
the way, and they didn't."
Initially, documents show, The
Pines saw T. as a serious case. The reasons for his admission to the
facility were manifold. Pines officials wrote in an assessment that T.
"represents an actual and potential danger to himself and others as
evidenced by his frequent episodes of self injurious behavior including
cutting himself in the chest, arms, legs, frequent episodes of physical
aggression, threatening to kill his mother including biting his adoptive
father, hitting the walls, running away from home ... [and] bringing
deadly weapons to school."
The facility's management promised
they could improve T.'s behavior and even get him well enough that he
wouldn't need to spend more time in another residential setting. But
under the center's care, Honeycutt and Pinon said, they only saw T.
continue his destructive ways. The facility, they said, failed to
accurately report problems to them.
Honeycutt and Pinon said they were
often left to navigate written reports that were either missing critical
information or contained contradictory assessments. In one example, the
reports failed to mention that Pines staff had left T. unsupervised long
enough for him to pierce his own nose with the broken tooth of a comb.
Nor had they witnessed him stabbing a hole through his tongue.
While the family heard from T.
about how the staff had physically restrained him on multiple occasions,
Pines officials failed to report most of the incidents. In one month,
Pinon recalled, T. had been physically restrained more than 10 times.
She also said her brother reported being chemically restrained. During
one restraint, his family said, a Pines employee broke T.'s glasses. The
facility never replaced them. T. later said to Pinon: "I've had knees in
my back. Knees on my head."
"None of the paperwork documented
the amount of restraints that he had," Pinon said.
Physical restraints were the
staff's go-to method of control, according to T. Even when he was held
down, T. said, staff took cheap shots -- jabbing him, pinching him and
punching him. In one incident, he said, he was slammed against a wall.
"They bend your arm in all
different directions and stuff," he said, adding that the staff called
him "faggot."
"One time, I was in a restraint and
a man punched me in my nose and my nose started bleeding," he said.
The center's low-I.Q. inhabitants
were particularly targeted, he said: "They would always hit in the
special residents."
Although The Pines was required to
provide schooling for T., confidential records show that he often didn't
make it to class. T. said that he was often held back over minor
infractions like talking back to staff. Sometimes, he'd beg to go to
class and was still denied.
According to his last report card,
T. failed five out of seven subjects. His Pines teachers cited his
absences as the main reason for his dismal grades. And yet, in its last
report to the family, Pines officials wrote that T. was "doing well in
school. He has grades from A's to C's."
Honeycutt seized on what she
considers the most painful document of all. It's another Pines
assessment of T., this one dated to this past February. A Pines
clinician wrote: "It is clear the family will not support T." because of
his sexual orientation.
The Pines was charging Honeycutt's
health insurance and Medicaid a combined nearly $20,000 per month for
taking care of T.
* * * * *
Honeycutt's account of her
experiences with The Pines rang true for Kimberly Imanian, who told The
Huffington Post that the facility has also consistently whitewashed
reports of her adoptive 13-year-old daughter's behavior. Her daughter,
she said, has been involved in six violent episodes, but only three were
actually reported. In one incident, the facility did not report that her
daughter had threatened to kill her roommate. The roommate remained in
place for months.
Imanian said her daughter has not
shown improvements since being admitted. "She does not want to be at a
place anymore," Imanian said. "She wants to get well. More often, she
asks, ‘Why am I not getting any better?'"
A UHS vice president, Car Evans,
wrote in an email that The Pines complied with all state reporting
policies. "The Pines reports all requisite incident or restraint matters
to the appropriate agencies or individuals in compliance with all legal
and regulatory requirements of the various states or municipalities with
whom we work with," he wrote.
But misinformation and an
unsettling lack of care appeared to be the norm at a facility even
staffers described as overwhelmingly depressing and disorganized.
Documents show a campus low on management oversight and staffed with
unqualified employees. "When I first got there, I was like, 'Oh my God,
I would never want to live here,'" recalled one current Pines worker,
who requested anonymity to speak openly about the facility's conditions.
Leah Mercer, a former Pines
frontline worker, told The Huffington Post she often did not know the
case histories of the children in her care. Mid-level managers simply
failed to give her each child's diagnosis, she said, and her supervisor
spent most of his time concentrating on his fledgling career as an R&B
singer.
Rather than providing
rehabilitation or care, Mercer said, the facility deepens old wounds and
even creates some new ones among the young residents. She said one boy
with no history of sexual abuse has started acting out sexually. Another
boy had been left alone long enough to dig into his arm with a plastic
spoon. AWOLs were commonplace. She recalled one incident in which an
employee threatened to kill a child; another called a kid a "piece of
shit."
"There are staff that continue to
be there that should not be in this line of work," Mercer said. "There
are staff that I feel are too rough, that don't have an understanding of
child disabilities. They don't understand that each one has
individualized treatment. You can't treat all children the same,
especially ones with disabilities."
Another current employee said she
believed that not all of her colleagues thoroughly reported deserving
incidents. "I don't feel that everybody that works at all three campuses
are there ethically to provide therapeutic care," the employee said.
"Some people are there just to get the paycheck. ... I don't feel some
of the people are educated to deal wit
Mercer said she quit over what she
described as unsafe staff-to-patient ratios, meaning that the kids often
didn't receive basic necessities. She said she knew of a child who
waited eight months to get a pair of glasses, another who endured a
toothache for five months before seeing a dentist and still another kid
who went without underwear.
"I've seen staff buy soap, socks,
underwear, shoes," Mercer said. "I mean, the kids don't have any soap."
In one case, Mercer recalled, she
had to move some residents to a new unit, but found that it had not been
cleaned. There were urine-stained floors, semen stains on a desk and a
pair of mattresses, a bloody mixture left on a bulletin board. She
described a different unit as a "dog pen."
Therapy could be just as haphazard.
A current employee agreed with Mercer's assessment that the
staff-to-patient ratios weren't safe. The other current employee
described the sessions as mere drive-bys, lasting 20 minutes at a time.
"Do you think you are ever going to
get anything accomplished in 20 minutes?" the employee asked.
"It's a moneymaking business,"
Mercer said. "That's all it is."
The current employee said there are
staff issues. "They're lazy. They come in late. The communication is
bad," she said. "There's a lot of money but I don't see it. It's going
to the wrong people."
Those at the top were well paid.
Santorum received roughly half a million dollars in cash and stock
options for his services on the UHS board. In 2007, he received $50,412;
in 2008, he received $77,958; in 2009, he picked up $45,000. In 2010,
Santorum took home a substantial windfall: $168,069. And on Jan. 19,
2011, he received stock options valued at $174,126, Securities and
Exchange Commission records show. The company and its CEO have also
contributed thousands to Santorum's political action committee and his
campaigns over the years.
When Santorum resigned from the UHS
board in early June, company officials had kind words for the former
senator.
"We appreciate Senator
Santorum's service on our Board of Directors and he has been a valuable
asset to our Company," Alan B. Miller, the UHS chairman and CEO, said in
a
press release.
"We certainly understood that should Senator Santorum formally announce
and initiate his campaign for President, it would result in his
departure from the Board given the substantial focus and effort required
to achieve that goal. However, Rick's guidance and stewardship will be
sorely missed."
* * * * *
In February, a Pines staff member
was caught punching a child in the face and torso after being bitten
during a restraint, records show. The incident was not immediately
reported to authorities. The staffer admitted, according to a licensing
investigation, that she had no experience in working with residential
treatment center kids. That same month, licensing found that "staff
currently providing therapy is not licensed or licensed eligible. ...
THIS IS A REPEAT VIOLATION."
The following month, two boys at
the Brighton campus, ages 8 and 9, confessed to engaging in oral and
anal sex, Virginia records show.
At the same campus a short time
later, according to records and interviews with Mercer, who saw a video
recording of the incident, and another staffer, a Pines worker grabbed a
9-year-old boy and dragged him across a table during a therapeutic group
session. Another worker then took the boy into a room and was captured
on video repeatedly bashing his head against a wall.
The staff member was suspended for
a week before being fired. She wrote about how she was spending her time
away from the facility on her Facebook wall:
"Backyard tanning was a success,
including nips ;P Ugh! Dread having not having A\C in a hawt ass house!
Time to take a cold shower."
By then, North Carolina had
concluded it could not continue to send children to The Pines. The state
had launched an investigation after parents came forward with an
allegation that their son had been sexually abused at the facility.
According to a subsequent report by
Virginia authorities, The Pines concluded that on at least one occasion
the abuse had indeed taken place. But the facility had failed to
immediately notify the parents. The Pines had described one incident of
inappropriate touching as "horse playing."
In mid-April, North Carolina paid
the facility an unannounced visit. Patrick Piggott, chief of the state's
Behavioral Health Review Section, reported his findings to Virginia
licensing officials. In an April 28 email obtained by The Huffington
Post, he said the state was making a formal complaint against The Pines
-- that the facility had failed in nearly all aspects of its
responsibilities. Piggott's group found:
- The Pines had
inadequate staffing for the entire month of January and two weeks in
February for all campuses.
- Employees lacked training on
utilizing non-restrictive interventions.
- No evidence of supervision in
any personnel records.
- No evidence of sex offender
training.
- No evidence of training on how
to write a treatment plan.
- No evidence of supervision
plans for unlicensed staff.
- Some therapists working in the
facility had masters degrees but were not licensed.
- Staff did not watch children
closely -- sexual activity among children had taken place.
- Allegations of
abuse or sexual misconduct did not result in clear consequences or
changes in treatment.
Piggott went on to note that basic
records of children often contained missing documents and contradictory
assessments. He also reported that "the child prompting this
investigation was at risk and there is evidence of harm yet the facility
did not appear to take adequate steps to [protect] him.
North Carolina would not wait for
The Pines to correct itself. It had already announced that it would be
pulling its children from the facility.
Meghan McGuire, communications
director for Virginia's Department of Behavioral Health and
Developmental Services, which oversees inspections of facilities like
The Pines, released a statement after North Carolina went public with
its decision: "Over the past several years, we have encountered
significant problems at the Pines' facilities that have required
tremendous monitoring time by DBHDS licensing and human rights staff.
Since concerns continue to arise despite staff's continual efforts, it
may again be time to reevaluate the status of their license."
Ten days after North Carolina
completed its investigation, Virginia authorities inspected The Pines'
Brighton campus.
Not only did Virgina's inspectors
corroborate North Carolina's findings, they uncovered 17 pages worth of
violations. They found scores of untrained staff as well as staff
working without proper documentation or licenses or criminal background
checks. The facility even failed to prove that its van operator had a
valid driver's license.
Supervision of residents was also a
problem. Inspectors found rampant use of cellphones in the units. One
resident, who had been placed on special precautions requiring 15-minute
checks, was not properly watched. "A review of the videotape revealed
that Staff did not perform the 15 minutes room check," the inspector
noted in its report. "The documentation of the 15 minute rounds were
fabricated."
In some cases, Pines workers may
have crossed the line into criminal behavior, as in the case of another
resident who reported being sexually assaulted while also on "close
watch."
The Virginia inspection turned up a
January incident in which staff showed the young residents pictures of
naked women and a February incident in which residents and staff watched
a pornographic DVD together.
That same month, investigators
found out that a resident admitted using and selling drugs within the
past six months. A source stated that the resident "also admitted to
buying drugs from a staff who no longer works at the Pines. Resident
admitted that he did the drugs in November and December."
On the day the inspection was made,
Virginia announced that it would be suspending admissions to The Pines
and issued the facility a provisional license. According to McGuire, the
provisional license means The Pines had failed in caring for its
children.
"A provisional license means that a
provider has demonstrated an inability to maintain compliance with the
regulations, has violations of licensing regulations that pose a threat
to the health and safety of residents served, or has two or more
systemic deficiencies," McGuire wrote via email. "It is a sign to
referral sources and payers that a provider is having serious problems."
* * * * *
Universal Health Services, in its
emailed statement to The Huffington Post, expressed optimism that its
oversight had corrected any problems at The Pines:
"We are pleased to report that as a
result of our efforts, in May of this year, two external independent
surveys by regulatory agencies were conducted at The Pines and found the
program in compliance," the statement reads. "Further, North Carolina
has expressed a willingness to work with our facilities and The Pines is
currently treating children from North Carolina."
UHS' statement appears to have been
overly optimistic. McGuire says Virginia's position on The Pines is
unchanged -- there continues to be a ban on new admissions. She added
that she did not know of any surveys by regulatory agencies and that her
office had two new, open investigations against the facility.
Brad Deen, a spokesman with the
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, said his agency
"has informed the Pines that without rapid corrective action to correct
the seemingly systemic safety and quality-of-care issues, the Pines will
be terminated as a N.C. Medicaid provider." He added that his agency has
relocated nearly all of its children and is not approving any new
admissions to the facility. Plans are moving forward to have all of the
state's kids removed from The Pines.
Whatever happens with The Pines,
Heather Pinon said she thinks the damage the facility has done to her
brother might be permanent. His depressive bent seems even more
ingrained, she said.
"Now he talks about dying before
he's 20," Pinon said. "He says he knows he's going to be dead by the
time he's 20. He said, 'Nobody loves me. Nobody cares whether I live or
die.' I don't know where that comes from. The person that came out of
The Pines is a very lost, very confused boy."
"I'm not sure it's reversible," she
added. "It's just -- they screwed him up."
After picking T. up from The Pines
in early June, the family members arrived home in Hamlet after 8 p.m.
Pinon and her brother stayed up late talking. The next morning, Pinon
fixed T. a huge breakfast of eggs, sausage, bacon and biscuits. They
shopped for clothes. They stopped at a Krispy Kreme. He had only one
blowup. The next day, he started to beg for more time at home.
"It was everything," T. said.
But after 48 hours, North Carolina
authorities had T. transferred to a residential treatment facility in
Orlando, Fla.
"I really liked being home and I
miss it," T. said in a recent phone interview. "I'm actually on suicide
precautions because I've been missing my house. I cut myself the other
day on my arm." T. said he had busted a hole in a wall, ripped out a
screw and used it on himself.
"People were picking on me," he
said by way of explanation. "It's better than The Pines, this place.
They don't pick on me that much."
In the final memo from T.'s last
month at The Pines, officials had concluded that he had "met maximum
benefit at this facility."
Shahien Nasiripour contributed
to this report.
This is the second in a series
of stories on UHS facilities during Santorum's tenure on the hospital
chain's board. Read Part 1: "Rick
Santorum And Universal Health Services: Presidential Hopeful Serves On
Board of Hospital Chain Being Sued By DOJ."
[HuffPost
readers: If you've ever worked for UHS or have been a resident or
patient at a UHS facility, we want to hear from you. Tell us your
stories by emailing
jason.cherkis@huffingtonpost.com.
Please include your phone number if you're willing to do an interview.]
Rick Santorum Tells Don Lemon That He Has
Some Gay Friends
Posted: 13 Jun 2011 03:00 PM PDT

Poor little old Rick Santorum just can't seem to get a break. What
has the world come to when an anti-gay zealot like Ricky has to suffer
such harsh attacks as he received from CNN's Don Lemon asking him if he
actually has any gay friends? Or maybe not, but some right wing blogs
that I refuse to link to thought that Don Lemon was terribly unfair to
Santorum for having the nerve to make him answer questions about his
bigotry towards gay people.
Keep in mind here that Don Lemon has
come out as not only being gay, but being a
victim of pedophilia as well, so I doubt that Lemon would be anyone
that would be expected to have a warm spot for Santorum in his heart to
put it mildly. Given that background, I'd say he took it pretty easy on
Santorum for his attacks on the gay community and his willingness to
demonize them for political gain.
Santorum once again proved that he should be considered the part of
the clown show that is the GOP's list of potential candidates running
for president in 2012 with this interview and good for Lemon for
painting him as just another Stephen Colbert satire where he claims he
has black friends as proof he's not a racist.
In the segment above, after citing a new CNN poll which shows that
voters are less concerned about social issues and more concerned about
the economy, CNN's Don Lemon notes that those poll results might be
"very interesting" to a presidential candidate like Rick Santorum, who
he points out "can be very divisive on social issues, like gay rights."
That was putting it mildly and it was good to see someone like Santorum
being put on the defensive for his stance on gay rights for once, even
if it was tepid at best.
I'm no fan of Don Lemon given his typical stenography for all things
right wing on CNN and for a lot of his coverage on that network being
little more than tabloid "journalism", but I was glad to see him put
Santorum on the defensive where he deserves to be during this segment.
Rough transcript below the fold.
LEMON: I was recently on Joy Behar and she said that, she called
you, I think it was a bigot, I’m paraphrasing, bigoted or homophobic
or what have you...
SANTORUM: I have a difference of agreement on a public policy
issue. That doesn’t mean I'm, you know, I hate anybody. I don’t hate
anybody. And I’m called by my faith to love everybody. I do. I mean,
I pray for people whether they’re for me or against me because
that’s what I’m supposed to do.
And just because I disagree with a, you know with what a
definition, a legal definition of a marriage is doesn’t mean I
dislike anybody or hate anybody or am spiteful of anybody or hate
anybody or am spiteful of anybody because I think that’s what best
for society. And we should be able to disagree without calling
people bigots.
LEMON: Yeah.
SANTORUM: I think that’s really sad that you have people on the
other side, because you stand up for something that has been an
institution in this world for 2,000 years, that all of a sudden now,
you’re a hater, you’re a mean person. I’m not. I’ve never been.
LEMON: Do you have any gay friends?
SANTORUM: Yeah. In fact I've had gay people work for me.
LEMON: Yeah. And friends.
SANTORUM: Yes!
LEMON: You know when people say I have black friends.
SANTORUM: I – well, I mean, yes, I have – in fact I was with a
gay friend of mine just two days ago. I mean, so, yeah, I do. And
they respect that I have differences of opinion on that. I talk
about these things in front of them and we have conversations about
it. They differ from me. But they know that I love them because
they're my friends. And they know that I respect and we have respect
for their (inaudible).
LEMON: You know that's the headline -- Rick Santorum has gay
friends.
SANTORUM: It shouldn't be. It was well known that Rick Santorum
had a leading gay Republican working for him for ten years. I don't
know what, I don't know that the, what the shock value is here. I
mean the fact of the matter is when for example, when there was a
man, who was working as the Executive Director of the national
Republican's Senatorial Committee, who was outed by one of the gay
papers, the first person who came to his aid was me.
Because he was doing a great job. So I, I understand the
narritive. It's always easy to sort of hang a narrative; oh, this
guy's for, you know, standing up for traditional marriage, he must
hate gay people.
No. I don't. I just disagree with what the issue of marriage
should be.
Rick Santorum Caught Up
In John Ensign Affair: Senate Ethics Report
Excerpt
from an Associated Press article on huffingtonpost.com on
5/14/2011
With the click of a
forwarded email, Rick Santorum let Sen. John Ensign know
that the cuckolded husband of Ensign's mistress was going
public.
Santorum, formerly a
Pennsylvania senator and now a presidential candidate
touting family values, is only one of many political and
spiritual figures drawn into the tale of Ensign's sexual
misconduct, political dealings and personal ruin that led to
the senator's resignation May 3 and a scathing Senate ethics
committee report this week.
Many of those named in
the report are only incidentally connected to the case.
Others tried to help hush up Ensign's unpleasantness with
cash, advice or both. The list is a long one. It includes
Ensign's parents; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Tim Coe,
Ensign's longtime spiritual advisor connected to the
National Prayer Breakfast and the C Street townhouse where
Ensign and other lawmakers lived while in Washington.
Ensign made his
resignation effective on the day before he was to have
testified under oath about his affair with the wife of a top
aide, the aide's subsequent lobbying of Ensign's office and
a $96,000 payment from Ensign's parents to the couple
involved, Doug and Cindy Hampton.
The ethics committee
said Thursday that Ensign broke federal laws, made false
statements to the Federal Election Commission and obstructed
the Senate panel's investigation. The committee sent the
results of its investigation to the Justice Department for
possible prosecution, saying it had assembled enough
evidence to warrant expelling Ensign from the Senate if he
hadn't resigned.
The report's brief
reference to Santorum alleges no wrongdoing on the part of
the Republican presidential aspirant.
The committee wrote
that Doug Hampton, Ensign's former chief of staff and
husband of his mistress, Cynthia, wrote a letter to Fox News
anchor Megyn Kelly on June 11, 2009, in which he disclosed
the affair and sought a meeting. On June 15, Hampton emailed
the letter to Santorum and asked for help. Santorum
forwarded Hampton's email to Ensign at a Gmail address that
evening at about 10:20 p.m.
"Sen. Ensign
immediately called an emergency staff meeting in the late
evening ... that lasted until approximately 3:00 a.m. on
June 16," the ethics committee reported. "During that staff
meeting, Sen. Ensign disclosed the affair, and also
disclosed that he had made a severance payment to the
Hamptons."
In an interview Friday,
Santorum adviser John Brabender said he had not spoken with
Santorum since the committee report came out but had no
reason to dispute it. Brabender said he did not know why
Santorum forwarded Hampton's email to Ensign.
Santorum, then a
contributor to Fox News, did not know Hampton at the time,
but did know Ensign from the Senate, so "I can't imagine
that he wouldn't forward" the email, Brabender said.
Santorum did not
immediately return the AP's requests for comment.
Coburn tried to get
Ensign to call off the affair with Cynthia Hampton, then
later tried to broker a settlement between Ensign and the
couple, according to the report.
Ensign eventually got
Hampton a lobbying job with November Inc., a Nevada-based
consulting company, after misleading the founders of the
company on the reasons Hampton was leaving Ensign's office,
the ethics committee said. Ensign's wife, Darlene, told the
consulting company's co-founder, Mike Slanker, about the
affair, according to the committee's report. Slanker then
confronted Ensign, who offered a "very weak" apology while
eating Wheat Thins, the report said. Slanker ended up hiring
Hampton nonetheless.
Coe, Ensign's spiritual
advisor, tried to get Ensign to call off the affair,
including one incident in which he phoned Ensign from
outside a hotel where the senator and his mistress were
ensconced.
"I know exactly where
you are. I know exactly what you are doing," Coe told
Ensign, according to the report. "Put your pants on and go
home."
At one point, Coe is
reported to have expressed incredulity when Ensign said he
had gotten Hampton a job as a lobbyist with November Inc.
"Well, that's insane,"
Coe says.
In August 2008, three
months after he resigned from Ensign's staff, Doug Hampton
accepted a job as a lobbyist at Allegiant Airlines and began
trying to develop relationships between Allegiant and
federal officials.
The following January
and in violation of a law that forbids former Senate
employees from lobbying current ones for a year, Hampton
pressed Ensign's chief of staff, John Lopez, to set up a
meeting between Allegiant and federal officials, including
newly installed Secretary of Transportation Ray Lahood, the
committee said. Lopez, still unaware of the affair, agreed.
Ensign called LaHood on January 29 to request that he meet
with Allegiant officials; LaHood agreed and the meeting took
place on March 11.
The day after the
LaHood meeting, Hampton and the Allegiant officials attended
a welcome breakfast hosted by Ensign and Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid, who also represents Nevada, in one of the
Capitol's most elaborate parlors.
Lopez and Hampton
corresponded numerous times on official business between
February and May 2009 on legislation important to Allegiant.
The issues included the Family and Medical Leave Act, travel
restrictions to Cuba and carbon monoxide regulations, the
report said.
"Sitting here today,
it's painfully clear to me ... that we were being influenced
to make a favorable outcome for Allegiant," Lopez, who was
granted immunity, told the committee.
More Washington figures
became entangled. The report details one incident in which
"Ensign used his office and staff to intimidate and cajole
constituents into hiring Mr. Hampton." When a Las Vegas
developer declined to hire Hampton for government affairs
work on the advice of Ensign supporter Sig Rogich, Ensign
was furious. He told Lopez to phone Rogich "'and jack him up
to high heaven and tell him that he is cut off from the
office and never to contact (Senator Ensign) ever again,'"
the report said.
"When the senator asked
me to do that, I really felt like this is wrong," Lopez told
the committee. "I remember really feeling like that was
abusing the office, you know, cutting someone off from
official action because he didn't hire (Hampton)."
In his farewell speech
on May 3, Ensign reflected on the value of hiring the right
staff and offered his colleagues – none of whom showed up to
hear him – some advice.
Senators should
surround themselves with people who will be honest with
them, Ensign said, "and then make them promise not to hold
back, no matter how you may try to prevent them from telling
you the truth."
He also referenced the
wide range of people drawn into his personal drama.
"I know that many of
you were put in difficult situations because of me, and for
that I sincerely apologize," he said.
"Rick Santorum is one of the
great pulsars of our times: a collapsed gravity well of unblinking
stare. People innocently walking down the street, are drawn
into his orbit, helplessly drawn in by how utterly dense he is.
They cannot escape the completely impenetrable mass of
evil darkness
surrounding his mind and become totally crushed & moronized by him."
By a Friend of
Religious Freedom
Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem
See a
related slideshow of Santorum
illustration outtakes here,
or watch related Santorum animations
here and
here.
Rick Santorum would very much like
to be president. For the past few years, he
has been diligently appearing at the sorts of
conservative events—the Values Voters Summit, the
Conservative Political Action Conference—where
aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show
up. But before he starts printing "Santorum 2012"
bumper stickers, there's one issue the former GOP
senator and his strategists need to address. You
see, Santorum has what you might call a Google
problem. For voters who decide to look him up
online, one of the top three search results is
usually the site
SpreadingSantorum.com, which explains that
Santorum's last name is a sexual neologism for "the
frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is
sometimes the byproduct of anal sex."
Santorum's problem got its
start back in 2003, when the then-senator from
Pennsylvania
compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia,
saying the "definition of marriage" has never
included "man on child, man on dog, or whatever the
case may be." The ensuing controversy prompted
syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who's gay, to
start a contest, soliciting reader suggestions for
slang terms to "memorialize the scandal." The winner
came up with the "frothy mixture" idea, Savage
launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though
mainstream news outlets would never link to it,
Savage's site rose in the Google rankings, thanks in
part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news on
the site or linked to it from their blogs.
Eventually it
eclipsed Santorum's own campaign site in search
results; some observers even suggested it may have
contributed to Santorum's crushing 18-point defeat
in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.
Savage says his site hasn't been
updated for years, yet it remains entrenched in the
Google rankings. Not even Santorum's ascent as a Fox
News contributor or his early campaign swings
through the key primary states of Iowa and New
Hampshire have managed to bury it. With Google
results like this, what's an aspiring presidential
candidate to do?
I
wanted to ask Santorum whether he had a strategy for
scrubbing his Web presence, but he didn't return my
calls. So instead, I asked a few experts. "This is
an unusual problem," says Michael Fertik, CEO of
ReputationDefender, which specializes in helping
individuals maintain a positive Web presence. "It's
devastating. This is one of the more creative and
salient Google issues I've ever seen."
Fertik, who points out that he
is not a supporter of the former senator, notes that
more than anything, Santorum needs to act quickly.
Once the campaign starts to make headlines again, an
increase in search traffic will likely help maintain
Savage's high spot in the rankings: "It's going to
be very hard to move."
To at least make a dent,
Santorum could try a concerted push to generate
links to his domain on
prominent sites and blogs, ginning its Google
ranking; Mark Skidmore, an expert in search-engine
marketing at the online strategy firm Blue State
Digital, says Santorum should also consider buying
paid search results for his name. He says the Obama
campaign successfully used this strategy to help
bury sites that claimed Obama was a Muslim or not an
American citizen. But like Fertik, Skidmore thinks
Santorum faces an uphill battle, in part because
Savage's site has been up for so long—with more than
13,000 inbound links, compared with
only 5,000 for Santorum's own site, America's
Foundation. "He's staring at a very big deficit,"
Skidmore observes.
That deficit might grow even
bigger soon. "I've sort of been in denial about the
fact that Rick Santorum is going to run for
president," Savage says. "But now I'm going to have
to sic my flying monkeys on him"—in other words,
mobilize bloggers to start posting and linking to
his site again.
Savage has not forgiven
Santorum for his seven-year-old comments: "Rick
would have prevented me and my partner from being
able to adopt my son," he points out. But Savage
does have a deal for the politician. "If Rick
Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to [the
gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it
down. Interest starts accruing now." Santorum may
want to consider Savage's offer. Otherwise, he's
kinda screwed.